101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya str. bld.20, office 541
+7 (495) 772 95 90 add. 22463/ 22484/ 22454
Join us on Facebook
Solodkov V. M., Tsyganova Y.
Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Penikas H. I., Stefanenko V.
Ihtifaz: Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking. 2021. Vol. 4. No. 2.
Grigoryev L. M., Pavlyushina V.
In bk.: Global Governance in Transformation Challenges for International Cooperation. Springer, 2020. Ch. 1. P. 275-297.
Chichkanov N., Miles I. D., Belousova V.
Science, Technology and Innovation. WP BRP. Высшая школа экономики, 2019. No. 92/STI/2019.
«Belarus is dominated by state-owned enterprises that are in manual control mode, the country's economy itself is relatively small and can exist for many years due to the infusion of money into it from Russia and the EU. Now Europe has expressed disapproval to Minsk, and the country's problems related to the inefficiency of the economy fall on the Russian budget. Roughly speaking, this means that Russian pensioners will live even worse. I don't see any concrete acquisitions for Russia from this».
Other Russian experts were no less skeptical about this prospect. Economist Sergey Smirnov expresses a similar opinion: «What is happening in Belarus now is outside the civilized world. Under these conditions, Minsk shifts part of the sanctions that it has been subjected to to Russia. Therefore, I suspect that these may be fire methods that will partially mitigate the consequences for Belarus. But we should not forget that Russia is also under sanctions, and it would be wrong to tighten them in this direction as well».